User talk:Wanli
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Wanli's user account has been deactivated because of trillions of "Google keyword" articles
Please stop adding "Google keyword" articles immedately. --Magnus Manske 09:27 Mar 24, 2003 (UTC)
Links in Uygurca:
- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/uygurlar/messages/2036 Turghun Almas
- http://uyghurstudy.org/ Ehmetjan Qasimi
- http://www.neweekly.com.cn/NEWS144.htm 中国：一个新兴阶层的诞生
Welcome! How odd yet wonderful to finally meet a Chinese Muslim! Alireza Hashemi
Man ne Chini. Uyghur.
[edit] Listed on VfD
A precedent should not be set that people can use subpages for storing whatever they like. Both Wanli2 and Xuepiao seem to be using the space as stores for research on University/school projects. Both hardly ever contribute to Wikipedia other than these subpages. Both have also ignored questions on their talk pages as to whether these pages are of any use to the project. Wanli was banned long ago and I see little reason to keep these pages (I would assume, though I could be wrong, that Wanli=Wanli2 which may be evn more reason to delete the pages of Wanli2). -- Ams80 17:19, 7 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- (Out of interest, is it possible to list the sub pages of a user, maybe I'm being dim but I can't see any way to.)
- A database query gives the result below. -- User:Docu
|
|
|
|
|
- delete all. some are also copyright violations. --Jiang
- The pages somehow remind of User:GrandVoivodOfErdely's. If someone has time to look at them. -- User:Docu
|
|
|
|
- Wikipedia is not a personal homepage and/or file storage area. Delete all these personal subpages. (Note: I have scanned only a few, and so may have missed some that are to do with article production) Kosebamse 09:19, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- Delete all, and then delete User:Wanli2, Xuepiao, GrandVoivodOfErdely subpages to delete. Angela. 11:43, Feb 8, 2004 (UTC)
- I don't think this is a voting matter, really. Assuming Jimbo sanctioned the initial ban (ref?) we can surely summarily ban the other two accounts (obvious reincarnations) and delete all the subpages, on principle. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 11:50, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- I've gone ahead and summarily banned both of Wanli's reincarnations. They have no contribution history except for those subpages, and are very obviously reincarnations of the same banned user. --Delirium 12:00, Feb 8, 2004 (UTC)
- Oh, and delete the whole lot of these subpages, too. --Delirium 12:04, Feb 8, 2004 (UTC)
- Oh, and I decided to ban GrandVoivodOfErdely too. He's edited many of Wanli's pages, and Wanli has edited some of his, and both of their anon edits are from the same IP range, so they're either the same person or associates. And in any case, he hasn't made a single useful edit to Wikipedia, so it's not like it harms anything. --Delirium 12:08, Feb 8, 2004 (UTC)
- You might want to look the following two below as well. -- User:Docu
- Mangmang ( Mangmang/One )
BigCat (BigCat/ehad, BigCat/shnaim)- Please excuse the amalgamation. I will list BigCat/shnaim elsewhere. -- User:Docu
- 24 hours (just to choose an arbitrary time) after my original posting will anyone object to rampant deleting of all the subpages of Wanli/Wanli2/Xuepiao/GrandVivoidOfErdely listed above? (obviously everyone's welcome to join in the deletion!) -- Ams80 12:41, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- And of Mangmang. I'm not sure BigCat is the same person though, I'm not sure they're doing anything useful though. -- Ams80 12:46, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- Big cat looks like a different user - and has actually edited articles. All the others should go though. Secretlondon 20:14, Feb 8, 2004 (UTC)
